Showing posts with label Jesus Christ. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Jesus Christ. Show all posts

Monday, January 16

Jesus’ Foolish Politics: Preparing to Hear the Sermon on the Mount

    Sermon for the Second Sunday after the Epiphany
    We are in that time between.  It is a time of joy.  The joy of knowing God has come, God is with us. It is a time of enlightenment. We have seen and heard of God come as the human Jesus of Nazareth. My message for us to day is a simple one. Fully entering Our enlightenment, our joy, is accepting and acting on Jesus’ invitation to “Come and see”.  But there is great deal to unpack in this simple invitation. 

    We have a related difficulty. After the coming of God in human flesh, we struggle to live by the light and the path revealed to us by this light.  The story we have walked through, god born of Mary like any other human being, god vulnerable to the machinations of Herod, god coming to the banks of the Jordan as just a normal unremarkable person. According to our passage in john even after the baptism and the heaven opening and the voice and the manifestation of the Spirit like a dove, John still points out Jesus to his own disciples and says hey, you might want to check that guy out, he’s the Lamb of God, and even so still others stick around John rather than going after Jesus.

    We have in all of this the mystery of the Church, the body of Christ in continuity with Israel, not so as to supplant the importance nor the reality of the Jewish people as God’s chosen people. The church is Israel taken up into Jesus of Nazareth, who fulfilled what Israel is, Christ fulfils the law. Also, the church is how the prophesies of the nations coming to Israel and being enlightened is also fulfilled. In this small community, we have this reality encapsulated, we have a member who is Jewish and who knows Christ come in the flesh and we have those who come from a variety of peoples in the world all of whom are blessed by Israel and the Jewish people, having been enlightened by Jesus of Nazareth the word of god Made flesh, the Israel and wisdom of God.

    Our moment comes after a long and varied history of the church in which those who call upon the name of the Lord Jesus, Christ have missed or not answered, or ignored, or betrayed the call to be the church. We Christians have relied on that which is other than Jesus Christ.

    There is a need to reacquaint ourselves as members of Christ body with the place of God’s presence in our midst. We need to be reminded that when God came in human flesh God did not reside at the centers of power. We need to contemplate and discern the meaning that  God coming in our midst and the manifestations around it, were missed by most everyone especially the powerful. The power brokers and well as the powerful had no idea that anything significant had happened.  Even many of the poor and the oppressed people in Judea and Galilee also had no clue.

    We may wonder what to do in this moment. We may wonder at the failures of members of the church to live out our faith, and to live into the call to be saints, as body of Christ, isn’t so much that we haven’t known what it is, as we the members of the body of Christ have consistently tried to dilute the call and the message by realism or by acquiescence to the powerful. We know it. We celebrate it year after year.  We know the teaching and we will in this liturgy read the sermon on the mount and have the teaching of Jesus clearly proclaimed to us positions other Christians take. But we can’t get mired in the failures of Christians and the betrayals of Christ and the Church, either now or in the past. We need to come again and ask Jesus Christ to show he is staying.  And we need to leave aside our assumptions and presuppositions and truly come and see.

    The Isiah passage we read reminds us that what we have been liturgically waiting for in Advent and Celebrating in Christmas and continue to celebrate in this season after the Epiphany, was proclaimed and anticipated by the Hebrew Prophets. We know well with Isaiah that the world can be a place absent of light and hope.  What we need to remember and see again that it is God who enlightens and offers hope, that the nations and the powers aren’t the means through which God offers this hope and light. This happens through a small and insignificant people on the world stage, the Jewish people that God chose to bring enlightenment and hope. Ultimately accomplished through the Jew Jesus of Nazareth. Of course, Isaiah has only a small glimpse of this, and much of what he says of this one and what will happen either is wrong or at least not literal. That is, we don’t know what we celebrate about the person Jesus of Nazareth merely because Isaiah and the prophets of Israel proclaimed it. Rather after the coming of Christ, the incarnation of the Word of God, we see what the Hebrew prophets saw and yet couldn’t fully articulate. We as often as not are like those around John the Baptist , not seeing , nor recognizing the reality of God with us.

    Tuesday, June 28

    Sermon for the Sixth Sunday After Pentecost,

    Scripture Texts: 1 Kings 19:15-16, 19-21 - Psalm 16 -  Galatians 5:1, 13-25 - Luke 9:51-62
    What is the Kingdom of God, basileia tou theou?   How might we address that using “king” and “kingdom” to talk about God and God’s activity often reinforces authoritarian structures that are antithetical to the community Jesus Christ creates in the Church.  We should recognize that exclusive use of King and Kingdom without attention paid to the meaning given to basileia tou theou is part of the problem. We should also note that “king” and “kingdom” are not static terms, and even in our modern contexts can refer to differing forms of governance.  The Kingdom’s of Saudi Arabia, Jordan, United Kingdom, Sweden and the Netherlands (to list some current kingdoms in the international landscape) all vary to some degree or another from each other.  All are Monarchies in some sense but the role and power of the monarch, the king or queen all differ.  This all suggests that as we run across “Kingdom of God” or “Kingdom of heaven” in the Scriptures we should pause and ask questions about what we bring to that phrases. We should also pay attention to how Jesus or Paul qualify “king” and “kingdom”.
    In the United States we have a distant and ambivalent attitude towards of Kings and kingdoms. We have fantastical and fuzzy romanticized view of say the British Royal family which is a sort of celebrity worship, or we think of monarchies and kings and queens in the autocratic and tyrannical version of monarchies that emerged as the kings in Europe developed the notion of absolute monarchy and the divine right of kings.  It is true that Christian theology and the church hierarchy was used to develop these notions of kings and kingdoms.  What we tend to remember in the United States is that God and kings were often elided in this attempt to shore up European royalty and kingdoms, Absolute rule by a singular being was upheld as the natural order of things, and authoritarian hierarchy was put forward as what good Christians and citizens of the nations should accept for good order. If we listen to Jesus’ parables and what in our text Paul describes as being contrary to the Kingdom of God, we can readily see that the above connotations of king and kingdom don’t easily apply to the ways in which Jesus and Paul speak of the “Kingdom of God”.
    In order to not bring the above senses of kingdom to what Jesus and Paul seek to direct our attention with basileia tou theou we can use other language in place of Kingdom of God that draws out the various metaphors and stories Jesus tells us about the Kingdom of God”: beloved community, the reign of God (The it remains that monarchs or maybe champions are what reigns, presidents and elected officials don’t reign), the Kindom of God etc. Yet we will still run accoss throughout the new testament we can’t get away from basileia tou theou, which in the very least means “reign of God” and usually translated Kingdom of God.  We still need to understand what is going on in Scripture with this language.  First we can recognize if we are aware of what we bring to “kingdom” and “king” and allow our notions of king and kingdom be disturbed, by the varieties of ways that the seeing God as basilei with a basileia, doesn’t conform to the authoritarian and autocratic.  I’d argue that this is part of what the use of “king” for God and ‘kingdom of God” are to do, we are to experience the dissonance between what God’s revelation tells us about God as “king” and the “Kingdom of God” and what we know of “kings” and “kingdoms”.
    The history of God’s people, shows us that we can often miss or refuse this revelation.  God’s intention with the freeing the Hebrews from bondage and bringing the people of Israel to Mount Sinai and presenting them with a Covenant, was that they would understand two things: 1) that there was only one God and one king, and that they were to see this one God as their king.  This wasn’t abstract authority over, but relationship with, a covenant between a people and their king.  In this sense kingdom isn’t territory over which a king has sovereignty and controls all that is within that domain, rather it is a relationship between a people and a sovereign in which each freely enters into tis relation in which each has responsibilities and privileges.
    We get the contrast between the reign of God under the covenant and what the people of Israel ultimately chose to have a human king. These human kings more or less poorly represent the reign of God and most fail miserably acting as we’d expect kings to act, in autocratic and authoritarian ways exercising power over others, in terms of coercion and force and not covenantal relationship.
    What Paul sets up as contrary to the basileia tou theou, the beloved community the reign of God, could be read as a summary of the historical books of the Hebrew scriptures, 1 2 Samuel, 1 2 Kings, and 1 2 Chronicles.  God sends prophets, beginingwith Elijah and Elisha , to call the people of Israel back to the Covenant that their kings lead them away from in their autocratic and authoritarian whims deemed necessary by real politic and the clash of empires and nations for dominance and control.  Israel is as we know eventually overthrown by these forces of empire and real politic of the clash of kings and kingdoms seeking to control and dominate over others and territory.
    The reign of God, God as king is polar opposite to the above history of the kings of Isreale.  Paul in our text today says,  the Beloved Community the Kingdom of God is characterized by love of Neighbor- this is the covenant God as king makes with us that we love our neighbor (and enemy)- and Paul further states that what then characterizes the Kingdom of God”, the beloved community is “is love, joy, peace, patience, kindness, generosity, faithfulness, gentleness, and self-control..”  These are the fruit of the Spirit, the evidence of living by the spirit of being ruled by the love of God. To live the life of the Spirit is to live in the freedom of the Kindom of God.
    I hope we are being able to experience the tensions and dissonance, that Jesus’ and Paul’s use of the Kingdom of God should elicit.  Of course this troubling of “king “and kingdom when used of God and what God accomplishes in the world and in us, only comes by taking the time to see what Basilea tou theou refers to, and its contrast to the clamoring for power and the desire to have control over others.
    We find similar juxtapositions in the icon we blessed today and in the imagery of the beloved community the reign of god used in the iconographic depiction.  Most immediately relevant is the depiction of Christ enthroned in heaven.  This is a diction of an Emperor, a King of Kings, Jesus Christ triumphant and victorious all powerful, Pantocrator in Greek.  The text in the Gospel is from Colossians 1-5-20.  The cross can never be far from any depiction of Jesus Christ.  All depictions of Jesus Christ must have the cross inscribed in the halo, along with the words O ON, in Greek meaning the One or the Being or the one who is, it is a reference to the unpronounceable name by which God names God’s self to Moses.  In the halo and depictions of Christ we have the fullness of the Gospel, the one who is, the unpronounceable unknowable circumscribable one, joined with humanity in Jesus of Nazareth and died on the Cross and rose again and is seated at the right hand of the Father.   But this icon of Jesus Christ isn’t the only icon. On the reverse of this icon we find another depiction of Christ.  Jesus as a child in Mary’s arms.  This is God the all-powerful, vulnerable dependent upon the care of his mother. God in the infant Jesus is God vulnerable dependent upon the love of another. The paradox and tensions of the incarnation.  Here again you will see that cross and the Name are there to remind us this is the same one who is seated on the thrown among the heavenly powers the 4 living creatures.  And although not depicted in this icon at every service upon this alter sits a crucifix and we see the same halo so inscribed the same letters indicating Jesus Christ. The childe the Pantocrator and the crucified are all the same one, all depicting for us God as king and thus the Kingdom of God.
    In this icon with Mary Mother of God embracing Jesus Christ and Peter and Paul embracing, we see the Reconciling love of God at work.  In these depictions we are invited into the embrace of God, Father Son and Holy Spirit.  These images draw us in and we may recognize ourselves in the embrace of our mother God, whose pinions gather us in in protection and warmth. We also see God at work Reconciling differing interpretations of who is included into the beloved community and how they may be so included.  Christians and the Church still wrestle with this, and on this Pride Sunday, we are painfully aware that as Christians we are divided on if and how to include and embrace LGBTQ.  Yet, it is in embrace that God’s Kingdom leads us.  These re images of Love, Reconciliation and inclusion, and they are images of God’s reign, of the Beloved Community, the Kingdom of God.  Peter and Paul were divided they were at enmity with each other in the early church, in the Jewish and Gentile factions each seeking God’s will, yet each right and wrong, each had to be drawn into the embrace as each recognized how those seen by the other as unclean or foolish and haughty could be drawn together into the beloved community.

    Contemplate these images Scriptural and iconographic, learn from them, let them soften our heart, may these images of God as King and the Kingdom of God, transform your heart, set you free, to embrace your enemy as God embraced us in Jesus of Nazareth and upon the cross that we may live together in the Beloved Community of Father Son and Holy Spirit. Amen

    Wednesday, March 9

    Sermon for the Fourth Sunday in Lent: "Disgrace of Egypt" and Reconciliation

    Scriptures for the Fourth Sunday in Lent Year C, RCL:

    “Today I have rolled away from you the disgrace of Egypt.” Entering the land of Canaan for the Israelites was to come to finally achieve being freed from slavery.  The manna which was the provision of God in the wilderness came to an end once they were in the land of Canaan, the land of promise, the Promise land.  The words of Marin Luther King Jr. in the sermon the day before he was assassinated “I’ve been to the mountain top and .....and I've looked over and I've seen the Promised Land” echo here.  I can’t help but think that he also had in mind this passage in Joshua and the rolling way of the disgrace of Egypt.

    I request your patience. What follows is a winding road.  The path I’m asking us to walk down has its dangers and at moments will look hopeless.  It may bring up fears, or shame, or guilt.  I request that whatever is brought up, that you let that come without judgement and without fleeing from what these words evoke. I encourage us to follow through this path, to come to a place where we can truly be on the path of reconciliation and liberation.  Some of what may be evoked in you as I guide you through this path is that the Kingdom of God, the Promised Land remains for all of us uncharted territory, and may always remain so, because that space is about union and unfettered relationship with each other through God whose ways are not our ways and whose thoughts are to our thoughts.

    I’m walking a tight rope of interpretation.  I want to encourage us to hear our texts and the story of the people of God, and yet at the same time there are ways of interpreting these stories and text that will inevitably lead us away from Christ, or towards a Christ of our own invention. we can too readily identify with Israel and miss how we aren’t Israel and how we are connected to Israel, if Gentiles. For White Christians this danger is an already realized fact of our interpretation of Israel.  We see ourselves as Israel when we have actually been Egypt, when it is the system created by European Christians as white that created the conditions of Israel in Egypt for African people as we enslaved them and justified it through appropriating to ourselves the identity of Israel. Europeans justified slavery in part by seeing themselves as the new Israel.  The American version of it is to see the U.S. as that city set on a hill the beacon of freedom God Chose to bring enlightenment and democracy to the world all the while enslaving and oppressing Africans.

    So, let’s be clear this passage can’t be applied to White Christians, not at least as White Christians have done so.  Gentile believers can be joined to Israel, but only through the person of Jesus of Nazareth, the Christ, a Jew.  Only through this mediation of Christ can any Gentile become part of Israel and then hear these stories as our stories.
    For Christians in the United states there are two distinct ways in which America carries with it the disgrace of “Egypt”. For black people it is the same as with the generation of the Israelites who entered Canaan in this passage, that they were formerly an enslaved people.  For White Christians it is that we were and are Egypt. (And Babylon and Rome) White Christian and the White Church is a gentile religion without Jesus Christ, the Jew of Nazareth the God the Son incarnate. White religion and Christianity. This is admittedly a depressing way of looking at this.  It starkly puts the point of division, a division that violently happened at the red sea, the division of Israel from Egypt, for the freedom of Israel and for God to begin to join with humanity through Israel. To the extent that White Europeans have enslaved and resisted the freedom of Africans and of Black people in the U.S. this division of Egypt for Israel reverberates for us in our day.

    So, after White supremacy after African enslavement after the holocaust how can white Christians take up and read the Scriptures?  Can Egypt become Israel?  How then might Egypt read and properly identify with this story and the words of Joshua to Israel that the disgrace of Egypt has been rolled away.

     this depressing picture of division and the impossibility of a meeting between Egypt and Israel is to be looking at things not from the perspective of being in Christ but of seeing things from the point of view of flesh and the human point of view. But today we hear Paul calling us to no longer view anyone or anything form the point of view of flesh, the human point of view.

    If we judge from the point of view of the flesh we may hear Martin Luther King Jr.’ preaching as addressing the U.S as Israel or the Black Church as Israel.  Such a reading though only offers division from Egypt, it doesn’t provide a means to enter the promised land and for the disgrace of Egypt to be rolled away, for Egypt remains other and negatively so, Egypt in this universalizing and abstracting appropriation of Israel leaves Egypt as only representing evil and slavery. It offers no hope of reconciliation Between White people and people of color. No hope of transforming relations of oppression into relations of liberation and love.

    But what if we hear all of this King’s words “I’ve been to the Mountain top I’ve seen the promised land.” from the point of view of being in Christ?  From within Christ we may be able hear King’s vision from the space of being in Christ can see the disgrace of Egypt in its duality for American Christianity.  In that space we can begin to see it as something beyond the history of the United States, beyond the history of European colonialism and White supremacy.

    Incredibly what Kings vision may illumine, if viewed from being in Christ, is that Egypt is among the nations that come to Israel along with all other gentile peoples who’ve suffered the disgrace of Egypt.

    The trick here is that we all are so familiar with the view point of the flesh, the human point of view. That it  is difficult is for us to fully accept being in Christ and to thus stop viewing others from the point of view of the flesh.  How do we with Paul no longer view other form the perspective of the flesh?

    The starting point is something we all if we have received the sacraments of the Church.  The starting point is Baptism and Eucharist; through these we do have access to this other point of view.  Through baptism and Eucharist, we have entered the promised land, that King glimpsed.  Yet, like our ancestors in Jesus of Nazareth the Christ, we have to be willing to enter in, to face our fears and walk through them. We have to accept our death in baptism, we must accept God’s substance in the manna come down from heaven.  But how do we embrace this unrealized reality that most of our ancestors who walked out of Egypt never fully embrace with only their children stepped into that Promised land.

    How do we step in to this place, how do we walk into the Promised Land King glimpsed before his death?  Howe do we take up a position from within Christ, from within the promised land and no longer position ourselves in the flesh, no longer seeing anyone or anything from a human point of view?

    Let us hear our brother Saint Paul. What does he say?  Are you in Christ?!  The answer is yes, through faith and baptism and consuming Christ in the Eucharist!  What does Paul tell us if we are in Christ?  Look, all things are new!  Do you hear that, can you grasp this, can you stand now, right now in this newness?  Chicago even as the old age continues to assert itself, Chicago is new, New Chicago (King speaks of needing to live in and seek this newness.)  But how?

    This view from within Christ is twofold:
    1)     it is to be in a new creation that is to be in the promised land
    2)     It is to be reconciled to God and to be then with God in reconciling.
    This is to no longer see anyone from the human flesh point of view.  It also means for us now being in two times and places at once.  This being in Christ is to be simultaneously in the desert that is in the age that is passing away and in the promised land, the new creation.

    From this point of view and not the human point of view. Israel’s entrance into the promised land of Canaan, that strip of land between modern day Egypt and modern day Lebanon, was the beginning of the whole world and cosmos becoming the promised land.  All of creation is to be the place of our being with God.

    From this point of view in Christ, what then of us who are Egypt and enemies of God and God’s people oppressors of other human beings?

    Paul says again Are you in Christ!? No longer view anyone including yourself from the point of view of the flesh, but from the newness of the promised land.  Look at yourselves and all with the eyes of God incarnate, Jesus Christ.  In that space, in such a moment of newness we who are oppressors and we who suffer oppression no longer need to view each other according to our flesh, according to the color of our skin as Whiteness dictates.  We must view ourselves and all from the space of being reconciled. Be Reconciled to God!  If you are reconciled with God, you no longer view any person from a human point of view, from that space of reconciliation there can be no enmity, nor lessening of the other, no disparagement of self or other. Yet to remain here, to enter here, to see with the eyes of God the Father, this is the constant challenge, and the place of our constant failure, where we fall back into the desert and the human point of view.

    And so Jesus told them this parable. Jesus tells this and several other parables when certain religious leaders were grumbling at whom Jesus Christ was welcoming.  Those being welcomed and those grumbling were Israel. Even in Israel there was division and looking at people accord to the flesh and the human point of view. 
    we are perhaps too familiar with this story usually titled the Prodigal Son, but it could as easily be entitled the Loving/forgiving Father, the parable to the two brothers.  For our purposes today I’d want us to hear this parable under the title the parable of the new creation in Christ.

    15:11b "There was a man who had two sons.
    15:12 The younger of them said to his father, 'Father, give me the share of the property that will belong to me.' So he divided his property between them.
    15:13 A few days later the younger son gathered all he had and traveled to a distant country, and there he squandered his property in dissolute living.
    15:14 When he had spent everything, a severe famine took place throughout that country, and he began to be in need.
    15:15 So he went and hired himself out to one of the citizens of that country, who sent him to his fields to feed the pigs.
    15:16 He would gladly have filled himself with the pods that the pigs were eating; and no one gave him anything.
    15:17 But when he came to himself he said, 'How many of my father's hired hands have bread enough and to spare, but here I am dying of hunger!
    15:18 I will get up and go to my father, and I will say to him, "Father, I have sinned against heaven and before you;
    15:19 I am no longer worthy to be called your son; treat me like one of your hired hands."'
    15:20 So he set off and went to his father. But while he was still far off, his father saw him and was filled with compassion; he ran and put his arms around him and kissed him.
    15:21 Then the son said to him, 'Father, I have sinned against heaven and before you; I am no longer worthy to be called your son.'
    15:22 But the father said to his slaves, 'Quickly, bring out a robe--the best one--and put it on him; put a ring on his finger and sandals on his feet.
    15:23 And get the fatted calf and kill it, and let us eat and celebrate;
    15:24 for this son of mine was dead and is alive again; he was lost and is found!' And they began to celebrate.
    15:25 "Now his elder son was in the field; and when he came and approached the house, he heard music and dancing.
    15:26 He called one of the slaves and asked what was going on.
    15:27 He replied, 'Your brother has come, and your father has killed the fatted calf, because he has got him back safe and sound.'
    15:28 Then he became angry and refused to go in. His father came out and began to plead with him.
    15:29 But he answered his father, 'Listen! For all these years I have been working like a slave for you, and I have never disobeyed your command; yet you have never given me even a young goat so that I might celebrate with my friends.
    15:30 But when this son of yours came back, who has devoured your property with prostitutes, you killed the fatted calf for him!'
    15:31 Then the father said to him, 'Son, you are always with me, and all that is mine is yours.
    15:32 But we had to celebrate and rejoice, because this brother of yours was dead and has come to life; he was lost and has been found.'"

    It is possible to find ourselves in many places in this parable.  But if we’re to see this parable from the POV of the new creation and not stuck in the flesh we should place ourselves in the place of the father (which is the place of reconciliation and new creation.)  If we continue to interpret this parable either form the point of view of the younger son or the older brother we have yet to enter the feast that is prepared, we have yet to fully embrace our baptism and the Eucharist, we have yet allowed ourselves to be transformed by our consuming of Christ week after week.  The reason for this is that both sons remain representative so seeing others and ourselves according to the flesh, the human point of view.  The younger is caught in self condemnation, the older brother is caught in continual condemnation of others.  Yet to be in Christ is to be in the place of the father. The Place of the father is to be in the place of simultaneous the desert and promised land, that is to be actively waiting and looking for moments of reconciliation, of return and repentance, of the newness of life.  This space of the father in this parable is the space of knowing ourselves to be already reconciled to God and thus by god to all others including those who we have harmed or who have harmed us.  We are in the space of the father in the feast of the new creation in the world that still need God’s reconciling work accomplished in Christ Jesus.

    Yet to come to the moment of the father actively seeking reconciliation, we must come through the moments of the two brothers. In the desert fleeing oppression, slavery and abuse, that Egypt will come to Israel is unimaginable. The oppressor, the powerful, the one who has inflicted harm and has robbed others of life and wealth and land and freedom, must accept the depth of their sin and turn and repent and not expect a joyful embrace.

    Yet in Christ, in God all these moments are held together in a loving reconciling embrace that forgives without denial, offers repentance with responsibility, but without guilt or shame.

    Here is the place of hope without fear that all the same sees clearly, to see trump and his supporters not from a human point of view but from the point of view of the father, who holds us all in Christ both those who are far off and those who are near.
    Step into the promised land, have glimpse of this yet unrealized reality of being in Christ, where all is new. But first we must come with our fears our doubts our grumbling our judgments, our fears and anxieties and say I’m still in the desert, I’m afraid of what it might mean.  I need to hold on I need to protect myself, even in that moment in Christ, God embraces and says, come put on new cloths, come and feast, come and be reconciled to God. Or maybe you are standing outside, confounded by why God hasn’t struck down Pharaoh like he did that one time, why there are still people who lash out, who are bigoted who threaten your very existence, and you say how can I enter in, and God comes to you and says you are mine, you always have been mine, I’ve never abandoned you and never will, come see all is new, death and fear and tears don’t have the last word, they are all passing away. Come eat, dance, drink, behold in Christ, already now even when this age is crumbling around us, there’s the new creation.  There God is in Christ reconciling the world to himself like the father waiting to embrace a son who selfishly rejected all the father had given him.

    Know that oppression and death don’t have the last word and the oppressor can return, Egypt will be among the nations turning to Israel, and you are already proof that this is so, for you are already in Christ, have already begun to enter, you are reconciled to God. This is the space of the promised land of being in Christ of no longer seeing rom a human point of view makes many things possible. Among the things it makes space for it makes space for the oppressor to repent and the oppressed to be freed from oppression and both to be reconciled to God and each other. This is the hope repentance and liberation. This is no longer seeing from the human point of view. Amen

    Sunday, January 17

    Transforming the Ordinary into Extraordinary Joy: Sermon for the Second Sunday after the Epiphany

    Scriptures:
    I
    Water into wine at a wedding, this is the first sign that Jesus performed. We have here such a tiny and puzzling story.

    In the grand scheme of things, the event is insignificant and we know very little about this wedding at Cana except that these were friends or possibly even family of Mary and Jesus.

    John is the only gospel to recount this event and John will eventually tell us that this is indeed very
    significant, though it is also very ordinary and happened in an insignificant place in this backwater of the Roman Empire, Galilee.

    John sets us up to see this event as significant. This wedding that is otherwise a quite ordinary event, a wedding in an insignificant town in Galilee, that would be unknown to us except for this story.  We don’t even know the names of the couple being married. The event in and of itself is like so many events in our lives, and event that will be repeated by many others, forgotten in time.

    John says this wedding took place on the third day.  If we read the Gospel in a literal historical way, we may think John is saying that this took place on the third day after John Identified Jesus as the Lamb of God and Jesus’ first disciples started to follow him.  But it is more likely that saying this occurred on the third day is to make us think of the Resurrection.  Just before this Jesus tells Nathaniel that he will see the heavens opened up and the angels of God ascending and descending upon the son of man, a reference to the crucifixion.  John has prepared us to see this as no ordinary event, even though it is simply an ordinary wedding of ordinary people in an ordinary town.

    Even so, Jesus doesn’t at first see the significance of this moment, rather it is his mother, Mary, who sees and at whose behest and insistence he performs this his first sign that reveals Jesus’ glory and the glory of God.  Jesus even says that it is not time, the Third day hasn’t yet come, and yet it is already the Third day.

    In this moment things begin to blur. Jesus provides some of the best wine the steward of the wedding feast has ever tasted, and in that moment this ordinary wedding feast becomes a feast of the kingdom of God, the wedding feast of the Lamb.

    And so we read Isaiah 62 where God promises to marry Israel and the land.  And so there has been speculation that this wedding at Cana was Jesus’ wedding, and this is why the bride and groom aren’t mentioned or named.  Historically speaking that is at best speculation, and at worst a form of literalism that obscures the significance of Jesus’ first sign.

    In that moment, at an ordinary wedding, in an ordinary town, at the marriage of two people whose names are lost to history (perhaps John own memory), whose celebration was about to be cut short, Jesus in providing wine shows himself to be the Bridegroom, the one through whom God has married humanity and all creation.

    Here at the beginning we are at the end. Here we are already at the joy of the Resurrection, of the coming of the Spirit at Pentecost and the consummation of all things, the marriage feast of the Lamb.
    Mary insists on the joy of the celebration not being cut short, and so Jesus’ ministry that leads to the Cross, begins in joy and as a sign of the marriage of God and God’s creation in Jesus of Nazareth. This marriage isn’t complete or consummated without the Passion, and yet it was accomplished through God the son becoming human through Mary the mother of God.

    Yes, lines are blurred, yes history and the insignificant and the significant come together in this moment. The wedding at Cana is and isn’t an ordinary wedding, and it was and wasn’t Jesus’ wedding feast, the wedding feast of the lamb.  This was the first sign that Jesus performed revealing his glory and his disciples believed in him. Through this sign of turning water into wine at an ordinary wedding, the wedding at Cana became the wedding feast of the lamb before its time.
    Through this sign we like Mary may see and name the ways in which this joyful feast, the wedding feast of the lamb is breaking into our ordinary everyday lives. 

    We are in ordinary Time after the Epiphany, we have begun counting Sundays, but this isn’t a time of drudgery or just killing time, rather it is a time infused with the light of Christ, of God’s manifestation in human flesh in Jesus of Nazareth.


    May our hearts be changed in this time after the Epiphany, may we have eyes to see.  Don’t cut short the celebration.  Basque in the insight that the love and joy of union with God is found now, even in the midst of the most ordinary events, even in the midst of dreary and cold winter.  God will consummate this joy, and we will also know sorrow before all is accomplished.  Yet today is also the Third day, the time to celebrate, the day of our enlightenment. 

    Monday, September 20

    The Everlasting Dwelling: Sermon for the 17th Sunday in Ordinary Time after Pentecost

    Failed to record the sermon on Sunday. What follows is a manuscript based on the outline I used for the sermon.

    Amos 8:4-7 ;Psalm 113; 1 Timothy 2:1-7; Luke 16:1-13

    We generally identify with and are identified by those with whom we associate. This is how communities function and form. Are we, am I, part of this group or that? Who gets to say who is in and who is out? Who decides the boundaries? Currently before us is how do we create a pluralist society of tolerance? Is such a society even desirable? To create a homogeneous society or a pluralist one both require some control of association: Moderate Christian’s and Moslems are encouraged to distance themselves from what is labeled as the dangerous and fringe elements of their own religious communities. Diversity has its own limits and boundaries it would seem. What community do you belong to the Christian one or the progressive or conservative one? In response to such questions we hyphenate our selves to admit that we may have more than a singular identity. We become attached to these hyphenated identities and one side of the hyphenation will insist on dominance and so Christians as often as not try to assert their progressive credentials or their conservative credentials. Rarely is the question asked if such activity distorts our witness and Christian identity. Yet what is this Christian identity, should one even seek to identify with Christianity and the Church? Isn’t it better to modify that identity by other values and ideologies? I wonder are we too attached to our identities whether Christian, or American or conservative or progressive, or Queer, or straight, male or female, or androgynous? In becoming attached to our identities do we limit our ability to pray for all people and to make friends for ourselves universally? In being so attached to our identities are we not binding ourselves exclusively to certain economies of truth and ideology? We are seeking permanent homes for ourselves and in the midst of this search Jesus Says “Make Friends for yourselves by means of unjust wealth so that when it is gone, they may welcome you into the everlasting dwelling.” Jesus concludes the puzzling parable of the unjust manager. Do we as followers of Christ seek to make friends in the way the unjust manager has? Are we too? If we are to do so, what might that look like, and how may it change our engagement with the world?

    Paul enjoins Pray for all people, especially for Emperors and those in positions of authority as a means of engagement with the world and those with whom we live in the world. This sort of prayer instills in us an attitude and mindset. In prayer I have friendship and commerce with the world through petitions addressed towards God. Prayer acknowledges that God is at work in the world and cares for what and whom we pray. Prayer says we care for what and whom we pray. Prayer is an attitude of friendship. Prayer affects the world through the acts of God and by creating in ourselves a mindset of Friendship towards those for whom we pray. Thus Paul enjoins us to pray for all people to not draw away from those who wield power and who can and do wish us harm. We are through this prayer for all, as a church, to dwell in the world in peace, quiet, piety and dignity. We are not to abase ourselves, nor war against the world, nor add to the chaos of the world, but in confidence engage the world without attachment to these powers and authorities. That is to love the world freely across all boundaries and walls.

    Parable of the unjust manager is a story one who crosses all sorts of boundaries. Jesus’ parable is tricky and it refuses to be tied down to a singular meaning. We are thrown by this parable it upends our expectations and our sense of morality and ethics, it causes us to struggle with why Jesus tells this parable and what it tells us to do. It is helpful to remember that parables are not meant to map directly onto a desired action or ethical scenario. Parables are to encounter us and shake us up in order to move us into a place of transformation. So we have multiple possible meanings and are to look for the one thing we are to look for that holds the multiple meanings together. For this parable it is the shrewdness, or the mind set of the unjust manager. The shrewd and unethical behavior shakes us up, disables our ability to judge what we are to take from the parable. We are confronted with things we want to be, and which are disrupted by the story having dishonorable character as the exemplary character. The unjust manager is not loyal to his master or anyone but his own survival. He is unconcerned about wealth, or communities (households). He simply wants to be able to live without begging or back breaking work. He does so by ensuring that no matter his reputation he will have a place to live, because the other heads of households will be indebted to him for saving them money, by having forgiven part of their debt. The unjust manager is not seeking for someone to be loyal to, or to work for again but for a number of households and communities to be friendly towards him and take him in when he is in need, even if they know he is a cheat and a swindler. He has guaranteed that for a time at least in each household he will have a place to stay.

    What then is the attitude of the unjust manager that we are to have ourselves as disciples of Jesus? The unjust manager has an attitude of non-attached engagement. Non-attached engagement is the mind set we are to adopt. This is the attitude of God towards the world that is shown in the incarnation. God becomes both human and divine and thus in some sense neither purely divine, nor purely human. God becomes disloyal to God’s own divinity, in order to make friends with God humanity and the whole of creation! We are to take seriously the world in which we live and others we meet and inhabit the world with, just as God did in incarnating in the person of Jesus Christ. Like an unjust manager who has no loyalty to his master but knows the value of things and relationships that can be formed through material things, so we are to value the world we live in but for the purpose of making relationships that are not bounded by any household, or community or economy monetary or ideological.

    God in Jesus Christ embraces all things. God is the unjust manager, we too are called to have this carelessness about households and community loyalties, so that all may have dwellings into the ages of ages. The continued dwelling of all forever require this attitude, this shrewd dealing with ourselves and the whole world as non-attached engagement. To seek relationship with all to be at peace retaining our dignity as human beings requires us to transcend ourselves to be simultaneously spiritual and physical. This can be so because God is the unjust manager when God joined God’s self to the material world in Jesus Christ becoming human and divine and thus pure neither. God in order to embrace the whole world in love abandons God’s pure and singular identity, becomes disloyal to that which is spirit. The identity of the church then is a friendship with all that is truly catholic, i.e. embracing all universal and disrupt all loyalties but values persons and communities but in the valuing remains unattached to any particular community or economy. The goal of this is that all may come to know the truth of God love that lead God to care nothing for Gods own identity as God freely became one with humanity and all creation for eternity, dwelling in the love of God.

    Wednesday, February 17

    The Many Layers of Lent: Update Reflection

    Today is Ash Wednesday, and the beginning of the season of Lent. The 40 days of Lent remind us of Jesus' fasting and temptation in the desert, which in turn reminds us of Moses' 40 days on Mount Sinai receiving the Law from God, and the 40 years of wondering of the people of Israel in the desert before entering the promised land.

    Lent then has many layers. Lent can be a time of pilgrimage and journey, as we move towards and through the Passion of Jesus Christ. Lent is also a time of preparation, of testing, and purification. Lent is also, a time of encounter and revelation. Now most likely each Lent is not all of these to all of us all at once. As we begin Lent I encourage us to think about what is God calling you towards in this season. Are you being called on a Journey that will lead you to the Cross? Are you being "driven" into the dessert by the Spirit to be prepares and be tested? Or are you being called to a new encounter with God? As we go and receive ashes this day and we enter this Holy Lent I encourage us to ask what are we called to this lent, where is the Spirit driving and leading us? What is God seeking for you in this season? Consider then how you are being lead to engage this season of penitence and reflection and intensified discipline: be open to the guidance of the Spirit.

    Most of all I wish all a holy and grace filled Lent, as we contemplate the great mystery of the one who is truly the Lover of humankind.

    Wednesday, January 27

    Sermon Week of Prayer for Christian Unity, Third Sunday after the Epiphany

    Jeremiah 1:4-10 * Psalm 71:1-6 * 1 Corinthians 13:1-13 * Luke 4:21-30

    This week of prayer for Christian unity has been unsettling time of prayer for me. I do not know what has been stirred in you by God this week or if you . For me I was unsettled by having this years theme of this years Week of Prayer for Christian Unity, "You are witnesses of these things" came into conversation with Paul on the Spirit and the nature of the body of Christ. What follows is my own attempt to articulate how I have been unsettled, and hope to invite your own reflections and offerings of your own experiences of prayer for Christian unity to come in conversation with my own experience, the theme, and these text before us today.

    The beginning of my discomfort is in the very fact of praying for Christian unity, for in so doing we admit that we remain in a state of disunion. Then In speaking of being witnesses, we speak of our desire and our sense that although we are divided as Christians we have something in common at our core, and that our witness to these things we hold together is compromised by this disunity. Paul uses the metaphor of the Body, to give us an understanding of the nature of the church, the nature of Christ. Through Baptism and the life of the Spirit we are one body, Christ’s body. Yet, this whole passage as an exhortation means that we can live in contradiction to the unity we are given through baptism and the Spirit. In the unity of baptism and the Spirit we are empowered to witness to the things of Christ: his life death and resurrection. And yet this week of prayer for Christian unity should give us pause, in terms of our own spiritual health, and our being formed by the nature of the Church Paul explicates for us in Corinthians. If we are willing to remain content with our own particular witness, whether of our own individual journeys of faith, or as journey tied to a particular denomination, are we not in a sense giving priority to our own “giftedness”? And doesn’t even the various schemes for seeking unity and understanding between Christians keep us divided, if it stops at merely seeking to understand each other and work together? In our attempt to find ways to work together across institutional barriers and barriers of belief, or to work towards convergence in the area of doctrine and belief, and even to work towards ecumenical congregation are we assuming the need to get along rather than assuming we need to be conformed to the Spirit and our Baptism. Yet this week isn’t the week of focus on the work of ecumenism but of prayer. In this we admit that the unity of being witnesses of the life death and Resurrection of Christ, of truly being the church is Spirit directed and Spirit gifted reality into which we must be formed by God. I want to suggest that this sort of prayer should open ourselves up to God showing us the ways in which we all uphold the state of disunity, and the ways we abandon the Church. For our disunity is a sign that we have walked away from the truth of our Baptism and our Spirit filled lives in the Church. This is the urgency of Paul’s address to the Corinthians. We must not remain in the sense of sufficiency of our separate witness and distinctive ways of proclaiming Christ, for to do so is to walk the path of schism. But the hope of this week and of our texts is that we don’t have to work harder Rather we must be opened up to the reality of the church as Spiritual institution and organism.

    Our Corinthians passage challenges any notion that Christian unity is coexistence, or acceptance that we all truly believe in Jesus even though we differ and at times contradict one another in our beliefs and actions. What is imaged for us of Christ, the Church, is a great symmetry and an organism made up of parts that cannot survive or even exist apart from the whole. Thus our unity as Christians as based upon the preceding reality: the unity of the Body of Christ, the Church. Granted we could miss this mystical reading of the Body imagery and read Paul’s words as exhortation to just get along for one must not overlook that Paul’s teaching is also about diversity. However I think in following the diversity path we miss that the difference Paul speaks of is not of human origin but of divine origin, of the Spirit. Paul’s use of the metaphor of the Body challenges our current language of diversity that is for the most part a tolerance of separate coexistence. A body isn't a confederation of interrelated differentiated sovereignty's, but an organism that is dependent on the right functioning of every part and member of the organism that has no possible existence outside that organism. For a body to functioning fully and properly each and every member not only needs the others but an integration in the whole.. We aren't to view our giftedness as a reason to separate from others, rather we are to see that we all equally need the other.

    I feel that the force of Paul’s indictment against us in his language of the body of Christ, is reinforced if we think along side this metaphor the reality of what is needed to truly be witness of Christ. When we receive gifts from the Spirit, whatever they may be, we are so gifted for a purpose of bearing witness to Christ. Thus in speaking of the Spiritual reality of the church as organism and institution we must not for get that we exist for and as Christ. Thus the unity of our witness is that we witness to the singular work of God through Christ in the world. My own denomination will often speak of our contribution to the building of the Kingdom of God which also goes on beyond our borders. Yet, this in practice means that we celebrate and witness to the ways we believe according to our denominational distinctive we are accomplishing the work of God in Jesus Christ. This way of speaking and thinking fails to question how our identity may stand in the way of the work of Christ and the Spirit and may impair the witness to the life Death and Resurrection of Christ as that which establishes the Kingdom of God in the world; bringing release to the captives, bringing sight, and hearing and healing to all in need. Are we in our separation whether based in denomination or personal identity, or race or class truly joined to the work of Christ and the coming Kingdom of God? It is one thing to claim this, it is another for it to actually be. The challenge of our being called to be witnesses when Christians are divided and content to remain in separation, is that it is very possible we aren't witnessing to the work of God in Christ in the world. In our current states of separation we are perhaps at best witnessing to our own pet projects within the larger work of God, and at worst witnessing to our own agenda with little or no relation the God’s reign and work. Given the force of the metaphor of the body and the need to not witness to our opinions or positions, I am challenged that we need make our hearts ready to receive and be formed into the church, the Body of Christ. Hopefully that is what this week of prayer of Christian unity is doing and has done in we who have so prayed. This is a challenge because I am unsure this is what I want.

    I will admit that I am challenged by my own words, and it is a challenge to my self as an ecumenist and those of us here who are members of this ecumenical congregation as much to anyone here who identifies strongly or in part with a particular denomination. We are Christians but more important than our being of the same religion is that we are part of the Body of Christ, the Church. If we cling to a certain distinctive, or find ourselves separated by our opinions how then are we the Body of Christ? True we all may be baptized into Christ and able to claim some form of faith in Jesus Christ, faith and the sacrament of Baptism cannot be belittled, but are we in our current life and way of being Christian truly living into the fullness of our baptism and faith? Am I? In what ways do I resist the unifying work of the Spirit, and mistake what I have been given as the defining fact of my spiritual life? Am I, are we, living into our baptism or contradicting our baptism? And are we perhaps doing both at once? These are hard questions that this time of prayer set aside to seek God for Christian unity has brought up for me. I wonder if I, and we really desire to be the people of God, members of Christ's body or if in the end other identities prove more important in our day to day lives of faith? Are we going to truly allow the Spirit to bind us together to form us as the Body of Christ, or do we in fact in subtle ways resist? Does the fear of needing to get it right or the fear that we may have missed it keep us from truly seeking God in this matter? Are we praying for Christian unity in truth? Are we asking God to reveal to us our separation from Christ? Finally I can’t but see that all our separations (not just denominational or doctrinal) separate us not only from each other but from our head, Jesus Christ, and thus from the Church. This is why we seek God in prayer, for we must confess our known and unknown participation in divisions from the Body of Christ. Such division inevitably means that we have hidden from ourselves the fullness of Christ and the Spirit in our lives and the world. Even so the Spirit gives to us; Christ binds himself to us, and beckons us to live into the unity of our faith and baptism. We are continually invited by our baptism to allow the Spirit to form us into the Church, into Christ. Amen

    Thursday, August 13

    Sermon Tenth Sunday of Ordinary Time, August 9 2009

    2 Samuel 18:5-9, 15, 31-33
    Psalm 130
    Ephesians 4:25-5:2
    John 6:35, 41-51

    The tragedy of the story of David and Absalom is palpable, choices of both David and Absalom lead to Absalom’s death. This past week we remembered the bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, the horrific end to a horrific war. A whole slew of human choices lead us to that point. So often our choices as human beings collectively and individually lead to tragedy. In history, whether of Israel or our own we are confronted with the tragedy of so much of human existence. I say this at the top because neither the story in Samuel nor the memorial of Hiroshima and Nagasaki and the numerous horrors of WWII, not the least being the concentration camps, should be passed over in silence, yet this is not where I want to linger. So, acknowledging that much in this world as it has always been and is not as they should be I direct us to contemplate living in faith, a faith that should satisfy all our longings a faith that leads us to be as children towards God.
    This is perhaps challenging view of faith; faith is in this view is neither simply holding certain comforting beliefs about the supernatural world and being, nor is it ones own fundamental belief about the nature of the world. This view of faith challenges us by this exhortation to be like children. What might this mean: As we grow up one of the things we desire is independence. This is especially so for us within our culture that emphasizes individuality, self-sufficiency, and independence. We want to be different from our parents, be on our own, blaze our own trail. Yet in growing up our ability to become self-sufficient and independent is a dependent process. It depends on not only one’s parents but an entire functioning system that is the adult world, which even as one grows up one both wants to enter into and rebel against. Our emphasis on independence and individuality, at times hides from us the ways in which becoming our own person depend on what we push against in this process of individuation. Our ability to become different and move out on our own from our parents depends on the care nurture, and teaching of our parents and other adults. Dependence on others never really ceases, and who we are is due to who others are and how we have been raised, and the options we have been shown. But we often hide ourselves from these webs of dependence, or downplay connection and debt of those who have gone before. This tendency to not see the web of dependence may hide from us a radical notion in our Epistle and Gospel. According to Paul and Jesus we are not meant to become independent of God. Our flowering and fulfillment as human persons depends on God and being in true relationship with God.

    This sort of faith is what we reflected on last week, as that faith brings us to the waters of baptism and from the waters of baptism that our faith is sustained. Paul directs our attention to this faith as a calling as Christians members of the body of Christ. In speaking of calling I am not necessarily talking about a specific call from God to do a certain thing with your life or a period of your life, but that call which is shared by all Christians as members of the church. Paul describes what that should look like, and that this way of being is known in seeking to be imitators of God, the way children imitate adults.

    Jesus in Johns Gospel pushes further on what is perhaps objectionable about Christianity: the claim that there is only one who gives life to us and the world. There is only one who gives life to the world and as such we are only to have hunger for that one. This assertion of Christ’s reveals to us one of the things that is most difficult to keep attuned to in Christian faith: our responsibility and our dependence. God is the source of all life and existence; Christ is God, the Word who sustains everything. Yet, Ephesians reminds us that all in all of Christ does not negate the importance of our actions. While it is true that God in Jesus Christ is the one who gives life to the world, if we live in death, this life not only doesn't come to us there is that potential that those who we know and the world and the world around us continues to taste death.

    According to the Apostle Paul, once we understand all God has done in Jesus Christ once we have received God in Jesus Christ in faith and baptism and recognize that we are part of the people of God, the bodiy of Christ the Temple of the Holy Spirit, we then are to act in ways consistent with this reality, with life. As children we learned from adults around us what it meant to be human and human acculturated into a particular culture, we learned what it meant to be a man or a woman, how to treat people. In fact even as we wanted to be independent we also wanted to act like the adults around us. This is a complex process and there is choosing and sometimes this imitation is not of parents or a blood relative. Imitation can also be something asked up us. Someone gives us a piece of candy or bread and we are instructed to say "Thank you." We want something and the parent will tell the child "say, please may I have some candy." or we tell our children say good buy. Imitation takes on the both subtle things that a parent or another adult may not even be aware of, those things that very from culture to culture but aren't at the front of the mind, and the child imitates, and we take on delight when we see a child mimic some subtleties of someone’s personality. It is through imitation that we learn what it is to be human and what our culture understands to be appropriate human behavior. Paul's instruction here is about imitation, not of human beings but of God. God is the adult world we are to be acculturated to as Christians. We are to become like God, this is the point of faith and Baptism.

    We may struggle with the reality that becoming like God is a childlike activity. Accepting this journey of faith accepts our dependence upon a reality outside ourselves, which we can not wholly grasp, comprehend, or control. The language of both our Epistle and Gospel tells us that our relation to God is always like being a child in the adult world. These passages also reminds us that our actions matter although the source of our ability to act in these ways is dependent on another reality, another person, God. When Jesus says that the one who will eat of his flesh, which is the bread of heaven, will no longer hunger is to point to the centrality of this dependence, and also that only God in Jesus Christ satisfies us allows us to be who we truly are to be. Just as children cannot become who they are to be without the nurture support and example of adults around them.

    Paul's instruction is what we are to look like Christ as we are sustained by Christ. As we are given life, even as we still find that we are hungering after other things than God, We are to seek only after God to satisfy all we are and desire. Perhaps this feels limiting and constricting? Perhaps this is too much? We want our passions and hungers, they seem to give us life, but they exhaust us and never ultimately satisfy. The one of whom we are to eat and let satisfy our hunger sustains us, and is the creator of the entire universe, all that we see, of our very beings, thus is only what can ultimately satisfy our desires. The truth that in comparison to God we are like infants and toddlers all of humanity: we don't know anything about how to be, or what to eat, or how to live. Only in Christ only by allowing Jesus Christ to satisfy us completely, only by focusing on who God is, seeking to imitate and be sustained by God, can we know what true desire is, and what it means to be truly human. At times certainly this restrains, but like a parent who keeps a child from chasing their favorite ball out into a busy street this sense of restriction is safety and life. In some fashion our culture sees all this when we focus on righting injustices and seek after justice. Yet as a society as a whole in seeking for justice we aren't looking beyond ourselves but solely relying on our human understanding, as if children could know how to be adult without first imitating adult behavior. Our desire for justice is true but we do not want to look to the one who in Jesus Christ’s life death and resurrection showed us the meaning and source of the only justice that deserves the name. The Christian claim the claim of Jesus Christ and his Apostle Paul is that we cannot know life and justice without first learning of them from God, and being sustained by the very flesh of God. Or we have no ability to truly change ourselves and the world, unless, as some mystics have put it, we suckle on the very breasts of God. Amen.

    Monday, November 10

    Sermon Proper 27 in Ordinary Time

    Amos 5:18-24
    Psalm 70
    1 Thessalonians 4:13-18
    Matthew 25:1-13
    This is the outline of the sermon I preached on Sunday.
    Expecting, the Unexpected Hope.
    I) Introduction-
    a) Americans feel more hopeful after the election of Obama as President.
    1) The Election of Obama is significant for this country.
    2) Obama’s campaign ran on hope and change, to what degree his presidency will be able to live up the rhetoric, we will see.
    b) The scriptures direct our attention away from fleeting politics and all that is passing away to the day of the Lord, the coming of the Kingdom of God and the return of Christ.
    1) In this way Scripture tells us, we the people of God, to warn exhort and encourage one another with these words.
    2) We are to do so by reminding ourselves that God is beyond us and our politics and our works of justice and righteousness.
    c) We are to remember that God and the Kingdom will surprise, terrify, shock and comfort us.
    II) Amos’ warning
    a) The mistake - expecting God to be on our side or thinking that we are on God’s side without nuance or complication.
    1) Why is the Day of the Lord darkness and not light, Why might god’s coming be terrifying? The problem isn’t with God but with humanity with God’s people Israel who think God is just on their side.
    2) They were certain of the justice of their cause the justice and righteousness of their actions.
    b) Vs. 5:24 in context seems to say that one can only claim to be fully on God’s side if there is absolutely nothing damming up the flow of God’s justice and righteousness.
    1) The day of the lord breaks all those things that dam up justice and righteousness, floods the parched land of oppression.
    2) Here we have image of floods after the dry season or for us possibly the breaking of a dam, a wall of water of justice descending upon us.
    3) Amos tells us that the coming of God in the fullness of righteousness will be overwhelming to us because there are going to be blockages in us and our societies of that righteousness and justice.
    c) So Amos warns us be careful what you wish for it will also overtake you, none will escape the flood of righteousness when it comes. So we should warn one another with these words lest we become too comfortable thinking we can know completely and fully implement the justice of God.
    III) Jesus parable exhorts us to be ready for it is possible to miss out on the coming of Christ and the Kingdom.
    a) What is the fault of the Foolish virgins in what way are they unprepared for the coming of the Bridegroom?
    1) They don’t bring extra oil.
    2) They were only prepared for what they knew to expect, their fault was not accounting for the unexpected, the unpredictable.
    b) Like in Amos the issue is expectation and being open and ready for the excess of God’s coming.
    1) The coming of God will be other than what we can encompass and predict.
    2) In our seeking for justice in our waiting the coming of the righteousness of God we are to be ready to be taken beyond any expectation.
    c) So exhort one another with these words keep awake to the otherness of God, and that God is beyond any human concept of righteousness and justice. God’s justice God’s ways exceed and overflow our abilities. Be prepared to go beyond what is humanly defined as good true and just.
    IV) At first Paul’s words of encouragement about those who have died in the faith seem to distract us from caring for justice in this world.
    a) To understand this text fully we must ask ourselves what is the power of Death.
    1) Death is the power that founds and is at work in all injustice and oppression.
    2) Thus an appropriate response to injustice is mourning. When politicians fail (Obama will disappoint in some way).
    3) In our living into the Kingdom of God in this age and working for justice and righteousness there will continue to be reasons to mourn.
    b) So when we face the continuing power of death manifest in injustice, whether in our own country (Obama: as we have had to confront it in every Presidency) or in the Economic powers in the world or other nations states or in the death of loved one, how will we encourage one another?
    1) We miss the meaning of the encouragement to get caught up in debates about the Rapture.
    2) Paul is saying that Christ has overcome death and so even in death there is life and Resurrection.
    c) Christ had gone to Hades and returned.
    1) We or any who go on and face death whether through physical death or violent encounters with oppression and injustice can know that Christ is already there
    2) The realities of Death, injustice , oppression can not separate us from what is alive just and righteous, for Christ has gone ahead in death and through the resurrection has planted the tree of life (the Cross) in the midst of death.
    V) Conclusion:
    a) So we need to continual remind ourselves of these things.
    1) Our justice and righteousness will always fall short of God’s; none will escape the rushing water of righteousness when God breaks the dams of injustice and unrighteousness.
    2) So be prepared for what we cannot prepare. Be open to the surprise that is the coming of Christ in the fullness of the Kingdom.
    3) Lastly encourage each other with the knowledge that Christ has already overcome death, and we are or any who seem to be taking in the grips of death, Christ is already there gathering them to himself .
    b) We will overcome death and injustice only because Christ has already overcome. So in life or death we are in Christ by faith and Baptism.
    c) May we not forget these things as we gather and as we go out in the world, as we work and act for justice in the world, as we advocate for those with no voice. For our only true hope is in God being beyond our concepts and abilities to realize justice, and in God having in Christ overcoming death.